Layer 2 Scaling Solutions: Complete Guide to Rollups
Understand Layer 2 scaling on Ethereum. Compare Arbitrum, Optimism, Base, zkSync, and other rollups. Learn how they work and which to use.
Ethereum processes about 15-30 transactions per second. Layer 2 (L2) solutions scale this to thousands of TPS while inheriting Ethereum's security. This guide explains how L2s work and which to use.
The Scaling Problem
Ethereum's Bottleneck
- ~15-30 transactions per second
- During high demand, fees spike to $50-100+ per transaction
- Makes DeFi inaccessible for smaller users
- Limits mainstream adoption
The Solution: Layer 2
L2s process transactions off-chain but post data to Ethereum:- 100-1000x more transactions
- 10-100x lower fees
- Ethereum-grade security
- Same developer tools
Types of Layer 2s
Rollups
Bundle transactions and post compressed data to Ethereum:
| Type | Security Model | Finality | EVM Compatibility |
| Optimistic | Fraud proofs | ~7 days | High |
| ZK | Validity proofs | Minutes | Varies |
Optimistic Rollups
How they work:
Pros:
- EVM equivalent (easy to port dApps)
- Mature technology
- Lower computational overhead
- 7-day withdrawal period
- Fraud proof gas costs
ZK Rollups
How they work:
Pros:
- Fast finality
- No challenge period
- Mathematical security guarantees
- Complex proof generation
- Higher computational costs
- Varying EVM compatibility
Major L2s Compared
Arbitrum
Overview:
- Largest L2 by TVL (~$10B+)
- Optimistic rollup
- Nitro technology stack
- GMX (perpetuals)
- Radiant Capital (lending)
- Camelot (DEX)
- Pendle (yield)
| Metric | Value |
| TPS | ~40,000 |
| Avg Fee | $0.10-0.50 |
| Withdrawal | 7 days |
| Token | ARB |
Optimism
Overview:
- Second-largest optimistic rollup
- OP Stack powers multiple chains
- Strong focus on governance
- Velodrome (DEX)
- Synthetix (derivatives)
- Aave (lending)
- Base (Coinbase)
- Zora (NFTs)
- Mode (DeFi)
- Worldcoin
| Metric | Value |
| TPS | ~4,000 |
| Avg Fee | $0.10-0.50 |
| Withdrawal | 7 days |
| Token | OP |
Base
Overview:
- Built by Coinbase
- Uses OP Stack
- No native token (uses ETH)
- Aerodrome (DEX)
- Friend.tech (social)
- Growing DeFi
| Metric | Value |
| TPS | ~4,000 |
| Avg Fee | $0.05-0.20 |
| Withdrawal | 7 days |
| Token | None (ETH) |
zkSync Era
Overview:
- ZK rollup by Matter Labs
- Growing ecosystem
- Native account abstraction
- SyncSwap (DEX)
- Maverick (DEX)
- Growing DeFi
| Metric | Value |
| TPS | ~100+ |
| Avg Fee | $0.10-0.30 |
| Finality | Minutes |
| Token | ZK |
StarkNet
Overview:
- ZK rollup using STARK proofs
- Cairo programming language
- Different EVM approach
- AVNU (aggregator)
- Ekubo (DEX)
- Growing
| Metric | Value |
| TPS | ~100+ |
| Avg Fee | $0.10-0.30 |
| Finality | Minutes |
| Token | STRK |
Polygon zkEVM
Overview:
- ZK rollup from Polygon
- Type 2 EVM equivalent
- Part of Polygon ecosystem
| Metric | Value |
| TPS | ~100+ |
| Avg Fee | $0.05-0.20 |
| Finality | Minutes |
| Token | POL |
How to Use Layer 2s
Bridging Assets
Native Bridge (Most Secure):
Third-Party Bridges (Faster):
- Across Protocol
- Stargate
- Hop Protocol
- Synapse
- CEX deposits (Coinbase, Kraken accept L2 directly)
- Third-party bridges
- Liquidity providers
Setting Up Your Wallet
Add L2 Network to MetaMask:
| Network | Chain ID | RPC |
| Arbitrum | 42161 | https://arb1.arbitrum.io/rpc |
| Optimism | 10 | https://mainnet.optimism.io |
| Base | 8453 | https://mainnet.base.org |
| zkSync | 324 | https://mainnet.era.zksync.io |
Choosing the Right L2
Decision Matrix
| Use Case | Recommended L2 | Why |
| DeFi trading | Arbitrum | Deepest liquidity |
| Low fees | Base | Lowest average fees |
| DEX aggregation | Arbitrum/OP | Most protocols |
| NFTs | Base/Zora | Strong NFT focus |
| Building dApps | Arbitrum | Most mature |
| Privacy focus | zkSync | ZK technology |
By Experience Level
Beginners:
- Start with Base (Coinbase onramp)
- Or Arbitrum (most activity)
- Multi-chain approach
- Bridge based on opportunities
- ZK rollups for cutting edge
- Airdrop farming across L2s
L2 Fees Compared
Sample Transaction Costs (2026)
| Transaction | Ethereum | Arbitrum | Base | zkSync |
| ETH transfer | $2-10 | $0.10 | $0.05 | $0.15 |
| Token swap | $10-50 | $0.30 | $0.15 | $0.25 |
| NFT mint | $20-100 | $0.50 | $0.20 | $0.40 |
| LP deposit | $30-150 | $0.60 | $0.25 | $0.50 |
Security Considerations
Rollup Security
Shared Security: L2s inherit Ethereum's security but have additional considerations:
- Sequencer risk: Centralized sequencing (being decentralized)
- Upgrade risk: Contracts can be upgraded
- Bridge risk: Bridges are attack targets
Risk Ratings (L2Beat)
| L2 | Stage | Meaning |
| Arbitrum | Stage 1 | Training wheels |
| Optimism | Stage 1 | Training wheels |
| Base | Stage 0 | Full training wheels |
| zkSync | Stage 0 | Full training wheels |
Best Practices
- Check L2Beat risk assessment
- Start with small amounts
- Diversify across L2s
- Use official bridges when possible
- Monitor protocol updates
Future of L2s
Danksharding (EIP-4844)
- Proto-danksharding live
- 10x cheaper L2 fees
- "Blobs" for rollup data
Decentralized Sequencers
- Shared sequencing
- Based rollups
- Reduces centralization risk
Cross-L2 Interoperability
- Instant bridging
- Unified liquidity
- Chain abstraction
Conclusion
Layer 2s make Ethereum accessible to everyone. Whether you choose Arbitrum for its ecosystem, Base for low fees, or zkSync for cutting-edge tech, you'll enjoy the benefits of Ethereum with a fraction of the cost.
Follow L2 developments on Free Crypto News.
FCN Team
The Free Crypto News editorial team covering the latest in cryptocurrency and blockchain.
@freecryptonewsRelated Articles
Stay Updated with Crypto News
Get real-time crypto news, price alerts, and market analysis.